7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from UMG Recordings, Incorporated v. Tofig Kurbanov.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | UMG Recordings, Incorporated v. Tofig Kurbanov Anchor | green | “(1) the extent to which the defendant purposefully availed itself of the privilege of conducting activities in the state; (2) whether the plaintiffs' claims arise out of those activities directed at the state; and (3) whether the exercise of personal jurisdiction would be consti…” | 20 |
| 2 | UMG Recordings, Incorporated v. Tofig Kurbanov | green | “is not susceptible to a mechanical application” | 8 |
| 3 | Spanski Enterprises, Inc. v. Telewizja Polska, S.A. | green | “directs infringing material into the united states from abroad commits a domestic violation of the copyright act.” | 3 |
| 4 | Sneha Media & Entertainment v. Associated Broadcasting Co. | green | “places special importance on the fact that defendant initiated contact with the plaintiff in the forum state.” | 3 |
| 5 | Fredric Eshelman v. Puma Biotechnology, Inc. | green | “though the court's factual findings are reviewed for clear error,” | 3 |
| 6 | Lang Van, Inc. v. Vng Corporation | green | “when united states intellectual property rights form the crux of the dispute.” | 3 |
| 7 | Federal Trade Commission v. Andris Pukke | green | “(1) the existence of a valid decree of which the alleged contemnor had actual or constructive knowledge; (2) that the decree was in the movant's favor; (3) that the alleged contemnor by its conduct violated the terms of the decree, and had knowledge (at least constructive knowle…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.