4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fountain v. Karim.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fountain v. Karim Anchor | green | “a plaintiff asserting subject matter jurisdiction has the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that it exists.” | 19 |
| 2 | Fountain v. Karim | green | “in resolving a motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(1), the district court must take all uncontroverted facts in the complaint . . . as true, and draw all reasonable inferences in favor of the party asserting jurisdiction.” | 13 |
| 3 | Kreisler v. Second Avenue Diner Corp. | green | “(1) the plaintiff alleges past injury under the ada; (2) it is reasonable to infer that the discriminatory treatment will continue; and (3) it is reasonable to infer, based on the past frequency of plaintiff's visits and the proximity of defendant's business to plaintiff's home,…” | 6 |
| 4 | Calcano v. Swarovski N. Am. Ltd. | green | “a real and immediate threat of future injury” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.