Topic: the rule of lenity comes into operation at the end of the p… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #8568

9 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Callanan v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Callanan v. United States Anchor
scotus · 1961
green “the rule of lenity comes into operation at the end of the process of construing what congress has expressed, not at the beginning as an overriding consideration of being lenient to wrongdoers.” 12
2 Callanan v. United States
scotus · 1961
green “the rule comes into operation at the end of the process of construing what congress has expressed, not at the beginning as an overriding consideration of being lenient to wrongdoers.” 6
3 Callanan v. United States
scotus · 1961
green “only serves as an aid for resolving an ambiguity; it is not to be used to beget one.” 6
4 Gordon S. Sorrell, Jr. And June M. Sorrell v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
ca11 · 1989
green “while congress's later view as to the meaning of pre-existing law does not seal the outcome when addressing a question of statutory interpretation, it should not be discounted when relevant.” 3
5 United States v. Raul Rodriguez
ca11 · 1992
green “chose to address the 'crack problem' by enhancing the penalties for the more broad class of cocaine bases.” 3
6 United States v. Latoscha Ronice Fisher, United States of America v. Frederick Devon Fleming, A/K/A Frog
ca4 · 1995
green “this legislative history demonstrates that congress intended, with the enactment of clause (iii), to penalize more severely violations involving crack cocaine.” 3
7 United States v. Henry Booker
ca7 · 1995
green “congress was targeting crack cocaine when it passed the stiffer sentencing provisions for 'cocaine base.” 3
8 United States v. Jose Ramon Montoya
ca2 · 1996
green “no doubt that the guidelines' term cocaine base included at least crack” 3
9 United States v. Reynaldo Canales
ca2 · 1996
green “congress instructed the sentencing commission that 'the sentence imposed for trafficking in a quantity of crack cocaine should generally exceed the sentence imposed for trafficking in a like amount of powder cocaine” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check