3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun Thanoo.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Oakwood Laboratories LLC v. Bagavathikanun Thanoo Anchor | green | “take note of the elements a plaintiff must plead to state a claim.” | 15 |
| 2 | Michael Lutz v. Portfolio Recovery Associates | green | “if, after completing this process, the complaint alleges 'enough facts to raise a reasonable expectation that discovery will reveal evidence of' the necessary elements of a claim, then it plausibly pleads a claim.” | 15 |
| 3 | Michael Lutz v. Portfolio Recovery Associates | green | “construes them in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, and draws all reasonable inferences in the plaintiff's favor.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.