6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Purcell v. Gonzalez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Purcell v. Gonzalez Anchor | green | “a state indisputably has a compelling interest in preserving the integrity of its election process.” | 17 |
| 2 | Crawford v. Marion County Election Board | green | “while the most effective method of preventing election fraud may well be debatable, the propriety of doing so is perfectly clear.” | 8 |
| 3 | Crawford v. Marion County Election Board | green | “there is no question about the legitimacy or importance of the state's interest in counting only the votes of eligible voters.” | 8 |
| 4 | Marc Veasey v. Greg Abbott | green | “courts regularly utilize statistical analyses to discern whether a law has a discriminatory impact” | 3 |
| 5 | Chad Thompson v. Richard Michael DeWine | green | “the times, places and manner of holding elections for senators and representatives, shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof . . . .” | 3 |
| 6 | Texas Democratic Party v. Greg Abbott, Gove | green | “a roving commission to rewrite state election codes.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.