3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee Anchor | green | “the 'scope' of the judicial complaint is limited to the 'scope' of the eeoc investigation which can reasonably be expected to grow out of the charge of discrimination.” | 16 |
| 2 | Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-Appellee | green | “can reasonably be expected to grow out of the charge of discrimination.” | 15 |
| 3 | Stephanie Walker Nyree Preston v. Cheryl Thompson Don Kingston Glasfloss Industries, Inc. | green | “the frequency of the discriminatory conduct; its severity; whether it is physically threatening or humiliating, or a mere offensive utterance; and whether it unreasonably interferes with an employee's work performance.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.