Topic: when reviewing a trial court's ruling on summary judgment, … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #863

6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 274 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mergenthal v. Star Banc Corp..

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Mergenthal v. Star Banc Corp. Anchor
ohioctapp · 1997
green “when reviewing a trial court's ruling on summary judgment, the court of appeals conducts an independent review of the record and stands in the shoes of the trial court.” 202
2 Tokles & Son, Inc. v. Midwestern Indemnity Co.
ohio · 1992
green “the moving party bears the initial responsibility of informing the trial court of the basis for the motion, and identifying those portions of the record which demonstrate the absence of a genuine issue of fact on a material element of the nonmoving party's claim.” 39
3 Mergenthal v. Star Banc Corp.
ohioctapp · 1997
green “stands in the shoes of the trial court.” 15
4 Tomlinson v. Skolnik
ohio · 1989
green “must be given their natural and commonly accepted meaning, where they in fact possess such meaning, to the end that a reasonable interpretation of the insurance contract consistent with the apparent object and plain intent of the parties may be determined.” 11
5 State ex rel. Grady v. State Employment Relations Board
ohio · 1997
green “credibility determinations, the weighing of the evidence, and the drawing of legitimate inferences from the facts are jury functions, not those of a judge.” 4
6 Mergenthal v. Star Banc Corp.
ohioctapp · 1997
green “when reviewing a trial court's ruling on a summary judgment, the court of appeals conducts an independent review of the record and stands in the shoes of the trial court.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check