Topic: unless it is narrowly tailored to prevent a substantial thr… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #8669

7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re the Express-News Corporation and Cecil Clift.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 In Re the Express-News Corporation and Cecil Clift Anchor
ca5 · 1982
green “unless it is narrowly tailored to prevent a substantial threat to the administration of justice.” 6
2 United States v. Edwin W. Edwards v. Times Picayune Publishing Corporation, and Gannett News Services, Inc., Movants-Appellants
ca5 · 1987
green “the press i court instructed that redaction of juror names or portions of the transcript may constitute a reasonable alternative to safeguard jurors from unwarranted embarrassment and yet preserve the competing interests served by disclosure.” 6
3 United States v. Edwin W. Edwards v. Times Picayune Publishing Corporation, and Gannett News Services, Inc., Movants-Appellants
ca5 · 1987
green “within this discretion, therefore, the district judge can place restrictions on parties, jurors, lawyers, and others involved with the proceedings despite the fact that such restrictions might affect first amendment considerations.” 6
4 American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, Inc. v. State of Mississippi v. Edwin King and John Salter, Subclass Second-Appellants
ca2 · 1990
green “specific factual findings of the district court on the issue are, of course, entitled to review under the clearly erroneous standard.” 6
5 United States v. James Harvey Brown, Also Known as Jim Brown
ca5 · 2000
green “in general, a prior restraint (usually directed at the press) will be upheld only if the government can establish that 'the activity restrained poses either a clear and present danger or a serious and imminent threat to a protected competing interest.” 6
6 United States v. James Harvey Brown, Also Known as Jim Brown
ca5 · 2000
green “sequestering the jury imposes well-known and serious burdens.” 6
7 United States v. James Harvey Brown, Also Known as Jim Brown
ca5 · 2000
green “sham settlement' that derailed a 27 million lawsuit threatened by the state against david disiere, president of cascade insurance co., a failed automobile insurance carrier.” 6

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check