6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from South Broward Hospital District v. Medquist Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | South Broward Hospital District v. Medquist Inc. Anchor | green | “establishes a policy in favor of arbitration that requires the liberal reading of arbitration agreements and the resolution of any doubts in favor of arbitration.” | 10 |
| 2 | Bobbie James v. Global TelLink Corp | green | “therefore, 'if parties agree on essential terms and manifest an intention to be bound by those terms, they have created an enforceable contract.” | 9 |
| 3 | Sarbak v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. | green | “state contract principles apply in ascertaining whether the parties to an action have agreed to arbitrate.” | 8 |
| 4 | Thomas White, Jr. v. Samsung Electronics America In | green | “decades ago, the supreme court discussed 9 u.s.c. 2 as 'a congressional declaration of a liberal federal policy favoring arbitration agreements.” | 7 |
| 5 | Bobbie James v. Global TelLink Corp | green | “to manifest assent, 'an offeree must provide "unqualified acceptance,” | 5 |
| 6 | Motko (David M.) v. Sharpe (Ronald), Jordan (Michael), Anzelmi (Frances J.) | green | “must then refer the dispute to arbitration without considering the merits of the case.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.