3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. Wright.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright Ex Rel. Wright v. Wright Anchor | green | “applied incorrect legal standards, reached an illogical conclusion, based its decision on a clearly erroneous assessment of the evidence, or employed reasoning that causes an injustice to the complaining party.” | 19 |
| 2 | Ike J. WHITE III v. David A. BEEKS, M.D | green | “require a conscientious judgment, consistent with the facts, that takes into account the applicable law.” | 12 |
| 3 | Ike J. WHITE III v. David A. BEEKS, M.D | green | “a conscientious judgment, consistent with the facts, that takes into account the applicable law.” | 11 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.