3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Gul Khan Khattak.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Gul Khan Khattak Anchor | green | “waivers of appeals, if entered into knowingly and voluntarily, are valid, unless they work a miscarriage of justice.” | 20 |
| 2 | United States v. Gul Khan Khattak | green | “the clarity of the error, its gravity, its character (e.g., whether it concerns a fact issue, a sentencing guideline, or a statutory maximum), the impact of the error on the defendant, the impact of correcting the error on the government, and the extent to which the defendant ac…” | 14 |
| 3 | United States v. Rogers Lockett, III A/K/A Manny Strong Rogers Lockett | green | “where a criminal defendant has voluntarily and knowingly entered into a plea agreement in which he or she waives the right to appeal, the defendant is not entitled to resentencing in light of booker.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.