7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Artrip v. Noe.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Artrip v. Noe Anchor | green | “the trial court is vested with broad discretion in the establishment, enforcement, and modification of child support.” | 8 |
| 2 | Board v. Board | green | “kentucky follows the prevailing view of most jurisdictions in the united states in that government benefits in the form of social security for child support may be credited against the parent's liability under the decree or agreement of settlement.” | 7 |
| 3 | Board v. Board | green | “are not gratuitous but are paid as a substitute for lost earning power and are similar in nature to insurance benefits.” | 6 |
| 4 | Clay v. Clay | green | “there is a strong inference that recoupment or restitution should be disallowed.” | 6 |
| 5 | Commonwealth, Cabinet for Health & Family Services v. Ivy | green | “that discretion extends, pursuant to krs 403.211(2)-(4), to deviations from guidelines-determined child support amounts.” | 6 |
| 6 | Wong v. Hawk | green | “the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another” | 6 |
| 7 | Artrip v. Noe | green | “in the establishment, enforcement, and modification of child support.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.