2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 32 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jeter v. Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeter v. Astrue Anchor | green | “istrict courts may consider the lodestar method in determining the reasonableness of a 406(b) fee, but the lodestar calculation alone cannot constitute the basis for an 'unreasonable' finding.” | 16 |
| 2 | Crawford v. Astrue | green | “the attorneys assumed significant risk in accepting these cases, including the risk that no benefits would be awarded or that there would be a long court or administrative delay in resolving the cases.” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.