4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Marker v. Grimm.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Marker v. Grimm Anchor | green | “any court-ordered deviation from the applicable worksheet and the basic child support schedule must be entered by the court in its journal and must include findings of fact to support such determination.” | 14 |
| 2 | Pauly v. Pauly | green | “it is well established that a trial court's decision regarding child support obligations falls within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a showing of an abuse of discretion.” | 14 |
| 3 | Pauly v. Pauly | green | “a trial court's decision regarding child support obligations falls within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed absent a showing of an abuse of discretion.” | 11 |
| 4 | Michaels v. Saunders | neutral | “is whether the trial court correctly applied the child support statute, this court employs a de novo standard of review.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.