3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Murray Ex Rel. Purnell v. City of Phila..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Murray Ex Rel. Purnell v. City of Phila. Anchor | green | “although an individual may represent herself or himself pro se, a non-attorney may not represent other parties in federal court.” | 30 |
| 2 | La Mar Gunn v. Credit Suisse AG | green | “the federal courts 'have routinely adhered to the general rule prohibiting pro se plaintiffs from pursuing claims on behalf of others in a representative capacity.” | 8 |
| 3 | Murray Ex Rel. Purnell v. City of Phila. | green | “if an estate has one or more beneficiaries besides the administrator, then the case is not the administrator's own because the interests of other parties are directly at stake,” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.