2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chic Zoch v. Andrew Saul.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chic Zoch v. Andrew Saul Anchor | green | “even under deferential standard of review for social security disability cases, an alj must provide a logical bridge between the evidence and the conclusions.” | 28 |
| 2 | Williams-Overstreet v. Astrue | green | “the act does not contemplate degrees of disability or allow for an award based on partial disability.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.