3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 42 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of Bedford.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of Bedford Anchor | green | “render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses” | 25 |
| 2 | Northern Westchester Professional Park Associates v. Town of Bedford | green | “may render the judgment it finds warranted by the facts, taking into account in a close case 'the fact that the trial judge had the advantage of seeing the witnesses” | 14 |
| 3 | Strnad v. Brudnicki | green | “even if we assume that an easement is not appurtenant and did not pass automatically to the subsequent owners, a person who purchases the servient estate with actual or constructive notice of the easement is estopped from denying the existence of the easement.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.