3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lisdahl v. Mayo Foundation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lisdahl v. Mayo Foundation Anchor | green | “a finding is clearly erroneous when 'although there is evidence to support it, the reviewing court on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.” | 21 |
| 2 | Knutson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield | green | “a decision is contrary to law when it fails to apply or misapplies relevant statutes, case law or rules of procedure.” | 13 |
| 3 | Knutson v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield | green | “fails to apply or misapplies relevant statutes, case law or rules of procedure.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.