5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Lohorn v. Michal.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lohorn v. Michal Anchor | green | “a motion for summary judgment is not an appropriate occasion for weighing the evidence; rather, the inquiry is limited to determining if there is a genuine issue for trial.” | 12 |
| 2 | Carolyn HOLLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JEFFERSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee | green | “view the record and all inferences drawn from it in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” | 11 |
| 3 | Ppg Industries, Inc. v. George Russell | green | “in examining the district court's grant of summary judgment, our duty is to review de novo the record and the controlling law.” | 8 |
| 4 | Wolf v. Larson | green | “decide whether the record shows that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to the judgment as a matter of law.” | 7 |
| 5 | Carolyn HOLLAND, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. JEFFERSON NATIONAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee | green | “must view the record and all inferences drawn from it in the light most favorable to the party opposing the motion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.