4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shahriar v. Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shahriar v. Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc. Anchor | green | “derive from a common nucleus of operative fact.” | 16 |
| 2 | Shahriar v. Smith & Wollensky Restaurant Group, Inc. | green | “the discretion to decline supplemental jurisdiction is available only if founded upon an enumerated category of subsection 1367(c).” | 12 |
| 3 | Joyce Jones, Martha L. Edwards, Lou Cooper and Vincent E. Jackson, Individually and as Class Representatives v. Ford Motor Credit Company | green | “where at least one of the subsection 1367(c) factors is applicable, a district court should not decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction unless it also determines that doing so would not promote the values articulated in gibbs: economy, convenience, fairness, and comity.” | 7 |
| 4 | Joyce Jones, Martha L. Edwards, Lou Cooper and Vincent E. Jackson, Individually and as Class Representatives v. Ford Motor Credit Company | green | “economy, convenience, fairness, and comity.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.