7 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dole Hawaii Division-Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. Ramil.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dole Hawaii Division-Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. Ramil Anchor | green | “the court should not substitute its own judgment for that of the agency.” | 8 |
| 2 | Dole Hawaii Division-Castle & Cooke, Inc. v. Ramil | green | “where both mixed questions of fact and law are presented, deference will be given to the agency's expertise and experience in the particular field and the court should not substitute its own judgment for that of the agency.” | 8 |
| 3 | Price v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF HONOLULU | green | “a col that presents mixed questions of fact and law is reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard because the conclusion is dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case.” | 8 |
| 4 | Bumanglag v. Oahu Sugar Co., Ltd. | green | “not binding on an appellate court.” | 5 |
| 5 | Bumanglag v. Oahu Sugar Co., Ltd. | green | “unless the court is left with a firm and definite conviction that a mistake has been made.” | 5 |
| 6 | Camara v. Agsalud | green | “to be granted deference, however, the agency's decision must be consistent with the legislative purpose.” | 5 |
| 7 | Price v. ZONING BD. OF APP. OF HONOLULU | green | “conclusion of law that presents mixed questions of fact and law is reviewed under the clearly erroneous standard because the conclusion is dependent upon the facts and circumstances of the particular case.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.