5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 41 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wright v. Wright.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wright v. Wright Anchor | green | “such weight and quality that fair-minded persons in the exercise of impartial judgment can reasonably infer the existence of the fact sought to be proved.” | 24 |
| 2 | Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of Alabama | green | “hobson v. american cast iron pipe co. , 690 so.2d 341 , 344 (ala. 1997).” | 6 |
| 3 | Pittman v. United Toll Systems, LLC | green | “this court's review of a summary judgment is de novo. " 'in reviewing the disposition of a motion for summary judgment, "we utilize the same standard as the trial court in determining whether the evidence before it made out a genuine issue of material fact,” | 5 |
| 4 | Wilma Corp. v. Fleming Foods of Alabama | green | “hobson v. american cast iron pipe co., 690 so.2d 341, 344 (ala.1997).” | 4 |
| 5 | Rosen v. Montgomery Surgical Center | green | “we utilize the same standard as the trial court in determining whether the evidence before it made out a genuine issue of material fact,” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.