7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Perry v. Proposition 8 Official Proponents.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Perry v. Proposition 8 Official Proponents Anchor | green | “failure to satisfy any one of the requirements is fatal to the application.” | 15 |
| 2 | Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'n | green | “(1) the intervention application is timely; (2) the applicant has a significant protectable interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the action; (3) the disposition of the action may, as a practical matter, impair or impede the applicant's ability …” | 5 |
| 3 | League of United Latin American Citizens v. Wilson | green | “(1) independent grounds for jurisdiction; (2) the motion is timely; and (3) the applicant's claim or defense, and the main action, have a question of law or a question of fact in common.” | 5 |
| 4 | Citizens for Balanced Use v. Montana Wilderness Ass'n | green | “an applicant seeking to intervene as of right under rule 24 must demonstrate that four requirements are met: (1) the intervention application is timely; (2) the applicant has a significant protectable interest relating to the property or transaction that is the subject of the ac…” | 4 |
| 5 | Perry v. Proposition 8 Official Proponents | green | “the court may also consider other factors in the exercise of its discretion, including 'the nature and extent of the intervenors' interest' and 'whether the intervenors' interests are adequately represented by other parties.” | 4 |
| 6 | Carolyn Callahan v. Brookdale Senior Living Cmty. | green | “in evaluating whether these requirements are met, courts are guided primarily by practical and equitable considerations.” | 4 |
| 7 | SALT RIVER PROJECT AGR. IMP. AND POWER v. Lee | green | “the absent party would not offer any necessary element to the proceedings that the present parties would neglect.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.