4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from John Henry Casey v. Robert Moore.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | John Henry Casey v. Robert Moore Anchor | green | “as a general rule, a petitioner satisfies the exhaustion requirement by fairly presenting the federal claim to the appropriate state courts . . . in the manner required by the state courts, thereby 'affording the state courts a meaningful opportunity to consider allegations of l…” | 21 |
| 2 | Smith v. Baldwin | green | “the applicant has exhausted the remedies available in the courts of the state” | 9 |
| 3 | John Henry Casey v. Robert Moore | green | “by fairly presenting the federal claim to the appropriate state courts . . . in the manner required by the state courts, thereby 'affording the state courts a meaningful opportunity to consider allegations of legal error.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Robinson | green | “properly resolved only in a postconviction proceeding” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.