3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Alysia S..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Alysia S. Anchor | green | “evidence in which there is no serious or substantial doubt about the correctness of the conclusions drawn from the evidence” | 21 |
| 2 | In Re SLA | green | “is not exhaustive, and the statute does not require every factor to appear before a court can find that termination is in a child's best interest.” | 15 |
| 3 | McIvery v. United States | green | “in an appeal from an order terminating parental rights, the court of appeals must review the trial court's findings as to each ground for termination and as to whether termination is in the child's best interests, regardless of whether the parent challenges these findings on app…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.