8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Team Rocket, L.P..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Team Rocket, L.P. Anchor | green | “the adequacy of an appellate remedy must be determined by balancing the benefits of mandamus review against the detriments.” | 17 |
| 2 | In Re International Profit Associates, Inc. | green | “one such principle is that 'equity aids the diligent and not those who slumber on their rights.” | 5 |
| 3 | In Re Bexar County Criminal District Attorney's Office | green | “conclusively proved non-service of process upon the named gloria boone;” | 3 |
| 4 | In Re National Unity Insurance Co. | green | “an erroneously granted bill of review is effectively a void order granting a new trial and is an abuse of discretion that affords no adequate remedy at law.” | 3 |
| 5 | Texas Mexican Railway Co. v. Hunter | green | “appeal from the entire reinstated cause, when that judgment becomes appealable.” | 3 |
| 6 | Medeles v. Nunez | green | “maria mendeles' (not maria medeles) as the defendant” | 3 |
| 7 | In Re Moreno | green | “adequate remedy by appeal of the eventual final judgment in the underlying case.” | 3 |
| 8 | In Re Moreno | green | “an order erroneously granting a bill of review is merely voidable, not void:” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.