8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Valencia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Valencia Anchor | green | “if the issues raised are primarily legal, do not require further factual development, and the challenged action is final.” | 9 |
| 2 | State v. Padilla | green | “a trial court abuses its discretion if it imposes an unconstitutional condition.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Valencia | green | “the issues raised are primarily legal, do not require further factual development, and the challenged action is final.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Hinton | green | “the 'authority of law' required by article i, section 7 is a valid warrant unless the state shows that a search or seizure falls within one of the jealously guarded and carefully drawn exceptions to the warrant requirement.” | 6 |
| 5 | State v. Nordlund | green | “records, reflections, and conversations.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. Arreola | green | “grounded in a broad right to privacy and the need for legal authorization in order to disturb that right,” | 3 |
| 7 | State v. Nordlund | green | “modern day repository of a man's records, reflections, and conversations.” | 3 |
| 8 | State v. Nordlund | green | “records, reflections, and conversations.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.