Topic: e are mindful that we must not substitute our own judgment … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #929

6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 31 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Roseann Zirnsak v. Commissioner Social Security.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Roseann Zirnsak v. Commissioner Social Security Anchor
ca3 · 2014
green “e are mindful that we must not substitute our own judgment for that of the fact finder.” 11
2 Randall Pintal v. Commissioner Social Security
ca3 · 2015
green “the ultimate legal determination of disability is reserved for the commissioner.” 6
3 Mays v. Comm Social Security
ca3 · 2003
green “he alj . . . is not required to seek a separate expert medical opinion.” 4
4 Robinson v. Colvin
ded · 2015
green “pinions that a claimant is 'disabled' or 'unable to work' are not medical opinions and are not given special significance because opinions as to whether or not a claimant is disabled are reserved for the commissioner.” 4
5 Roseann Zirnsak v. Commissioner Social Security
ca3 · 2014
green “e must not substitute our own judgment for that of the fact finder.” 3
6 Randall Pintal v. Commissioner Social Security
ca3 · 2015
green “an alj is not required to cite every piece of evidence in the record.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check