5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In the Matter of Nice.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In the Matter of Nice Anchor | green | “preponderance of the evidence.” | 16 |
| 2 | In Re B.L., Unpublished Decision (3-17-2005) | green | “always subject to the ultimate welfare of the child.” | 10 |
| 3 | In re C.C. | green | “a parent can successfully complete the terms of a case plan yet not substantially remedy the conditions that caused the children to be removed - the case plan is simply a means to a goal, but not the goal itself.” | 6 |
| 4 | In re W.A.J. | green | “is limited only by the best interest of the child.” | 4 |
| 5 | In re W.A.J. | green | “is not dispositive on the issue of reunification.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.