3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gibbons v. Ogden.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gibbons v. Ogden Anchor | green | “interfere with, or are contrary to the laws of congress, made in pursuance of the constitution” | 20 |
| 2 | Gibbons v. Ogden | green | “interfere with, or are contrary to,” | 15 |
| 3 | Canale v. Colgate-Palmolive Co. | green | “where . . . congress has expressly manifested its intent to preempt state law, no presumption against preemption arises” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.