3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brittain v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brittain v. State Anchor | green | “an appellant must support enumerations of error with argument and citation of authority, and mere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by our rules.” | 20 |
| 2 | Tolbert v. Toole | green | “it is the appellant's burden, as the party challenging the ruling below, to affirmatively show error from the record on appeal.” | 17 |
| 3 | Brittain v. State | green | “mere conclusory statements are not the type of meaningful argument contemplated by our rules.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.