5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Beeman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Beeman Anchor | green | “a jury is presumed to follow the instructions, including curative instructions, given it by a trial judge.” | 21 |
| 2 | State v. Davis | green | “evidence of other crimes or wrongs may be admitted when such acts are so inextricably intertwined with the crime as charged that proof of one involves the other, explains the circumstances thereof, or tends logically to prove any element of the crime charged.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Skatzes | green | “all evidence presented by a prosecutor is prejudicial, not all evidence unfairly prejudices a defendant.” | 6 |
| 4 | State v. Heineman | green | “consistent with the emerging view under evid.r. 701 that courts have permitted lay witnesses to express their opinions in areas in which it would ordinarily be expected that an expert must be qualified under evid.r. 702.” | 3 |
| 5 | Vargo v. Travelers Insurance | green | “coroner's factual determinations concerning the manner, mode and cause of the decedent's death, as expressed in the coroner's report and death certificate, create a nonbinding rebuttable presumption concerning such facts in the absence of competent, credible evidence to the cont…” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.