4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Regan v. Taxation With Representation of Washington Anchor | green | “legislatures have especially broad latitude in creating classifications and distinctions in tax statutes.” | 23 |
| 2 | United States v. United Foods, Inc. | green | “the mandated support is contrary to the first amendment principles set forth in cases involving expression by groups which include persons who object to the speech, but who, nevertheless, must remain members of the group by law or necessity.” | 6 |
| 3 | United States v. L. Robert Frame, Sr. And Vintage Sales Stables, Inc. | green | “underlying rationale of the right to be free from compelled speech or association” | 5 |
| 4 | National Association For The Advancement Of Colored People (Naacp) v. Guy Hunt | green | “abood has never been applied to the government, however; if it were, taxation would become impossible.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.