8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from LVRC HOLDINGS LCC v. Brekka.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | LVRC HOLDINGS LCC v. Brekka Anchor | green | “permission or power granted by an authority.” | 8 |
| 2 | United States v. Robert Tappan Morris | green | “of common usage, without any technical or ambiguous meaning.” | 5 |
| 3 | United States v. Sergio Ramos-Atondo | green | “the jewell standard eliminates the need to establish such positive knowledge to obtain a conspiracy conviction” | 5 |
| 4 | United States v. Valle | green | “common usage of 'authorization' suggests that one 'accesses a computer without authorization' if he accesses a computer without permission to do so at all.” | 5 |
| 5 | United States v. Carmen Denise Heredia | green | “not limited to positive knowledge, but includes the state of mind of one who does not possess positive knowledge only because he consciously avoided it.” | 4 |
| 6 | WEC Carolina Energy Solutions v. Willie Miller | green | “far-reaching effects unintended by congress.” | 4 |
| 7 | United States v. Waknine | green | “demonstrating that it was reasonably necessary for the victim to incur attorneys' and investigator's fees to participate in the investigation or prosecution of the offense.” | 4 |
| 8 | United States v. Nosal | green | “the indictment sufficiently alleged such circumvention.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.