7 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rogers v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rogers v. State Anchor | green | “rather, it refers to 'an undue tendency to suggest decision on an improper basis, commonly, though not necessarily, an emotional one.” | 10 |
| 2 | Walters v. State | green | “is designed to reduce the possibility of the jury receiving a false impression from hearing only a part of some act, conversation, or writing.” | 9 |
| 3 | Karenev v. State | green | “the state and the trial court should not be required to anticipate that a statute may later be held to be unconstitutional.” | 5 |
| 4 | Robinson v. State | green | “a proper instruction on the limited use of an extraneous offense will also lessen the prejudice.” | 5 |
| 5 | Simpson v. State | green | “a proper instruction on the limited use of an extraneous offense will also lessen the prejudice.” | 4 |
| 6 | Wilson v. State | green | “new definition clearly invites a vagueness and overbreadth challenge to the statute” | 3 |
| 7 | Wilson v. State | green | “simply speaks in terms of the number of telephone communications, it does not attempt to define the 12 required frequency of the communications or temporal proximity of one communication to another.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.