2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 30 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Christopher Cantu v. City of Dothan, Alabama.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Christopher Cantu v. City of Dothan, Alabama Anchor | green | “the 'facts' at the summary judgment stage are not necessarily the true, historical facts; they may not be what a jury at trial would, or will, determine to be the facts.” | 22 |
| 2 | Fils v. City of Aventura | green | “istrict courts cannot concoct or resurrect arguments neither made nor advanced by the parties.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.