8 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Cole v. HARVEYLAND, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cole v. HARVEYLAND, LLC Anchor | green | “the critical concept in determining whether a court has subject matter jurisdiction is the type of controversy.” | 8 |
| 2 | Cole v. HARVEYLAND, LLC | green | “if the type of controversy is within the subject matter jurisdiction, then all other defects or errors go to something other than subject matter jurisdiction.” | 7 |
| 3 | Marley v. Department of Labor & Industries | green | “a court or agency does not lack subject matter jurisdiction solely because it may lack authority to enter a given order.” | 5 |
| 4 | Shoop v. Kittitas County | green | “constitution provides the foundation for an independent and coequal judicial branch of state government.” | 5 |
| 5 | Cole v. HARVEYLAND, LLC | green | “as the united states supreme court has observed, 'jurisdiction' is a word of too many meanings.” | 4 |
| 6 | Shoop v. Kittitas County | green | “subject matter jurisdiction that cannot be whittled away by statutes.” | 4 |
| 7 | Shoop v. Kittitas County | green | “to adjudicate the type of controversy involved in the action.” | 4 |
| 8 | Shoop v. Kittitas County | green | “to adjudicate the type of controversy involved in the action.” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.