4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ciara Vesey v. Envoy Air, Incorporated.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ciara Vesey v. Envoy Air, Incorporated Anchor | green | “relief under rule 59(e) is an 'extraordinary remedy reserved for the exceptional case.” | 15 |
| 2 | Victor Robinson v. Jolinda Waterman | green | “a motion under rule 59(e) may be granted only if there has been a manifest error of fact or law, or if there is newly discovered evidence that was not previously available.” | 12 |
| 3 | Sosebee v. Astrue | green | “rule 59(e) motions offer district courts an opportunity to correct errors that may have crept into the proceeding, before the case leaves the district court for good.” | 8 |
| 4 | Ciara Vesey v. Envoy Air, Incorporated | green | “relief under rule 59(e) is an extraordinary remedy reserved for the exceptional case.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.