3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Keetch v. Kroger Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Keetch v. Kroger Co. Anchor | green | “recovery on a negligent activity theory requires that the person have been injured by or as a contemporaneous result of the activity itself rather than by a condition created by the activity.” | 23 |
| 2 | Keetch v. Kroger Co. | green | “injured by or as a contemporaneous result of the activity itself rather than by a condition created by the activity.” | 10 |
| 3 | John Sampson v. the University of Texas at Austin | green | “when distinguishing between a negligent activity and a premises defect, the texas supreme court has focused on whether the injury occurred by or as a contemporaneous result of the activity itself-a negligent activity-or rather by a condition created by the activity-a premises de…” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.