6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Porto.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Porto Anchor | green | “specific factual allegations of 'serious complaints about counsel” | 12 |
| 2 | People v. Porto | green | “specific factual allegations of serious complaints about counsel” | 8 |
| 3 | People v. Sides | green | “the nature of the disagreement or its potential for resolution” | 7 |
| 4 | People v. Arroyave | green | “does not bestow upon a criminal defendant the absolute right to demand that his trial be delayed while he selects another attorney to represent him at trial” | 4 |
| 5 | People v. MacLean | green | “made only vague assertions that defense counsel was not in frequent contact with him and did not aid in his defense” | 4 |
| 6 | People v. Hoyt | green | “the court afforded defendant the opportunity to express his objections concerning defense counsel, and the court thereafter reasonably concluded that defendant's objections were without merit” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.