4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Culbertson v. Berryhill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Culbertson v. Berryhill Anchor | green | “a petition for fees under 406(b)(1) must be brought within a reasonable time.” | 19 |
| 2 | Christian Arnold v. Martin J. O'Malley | green | “a district court must begin with the contingency award as its polestar and consider whether that amount should be reduced because it is unwarranted based on relevant factors, such as the claimant's satisfaction with their attorney's representation, the attorney's expertise and e…” | 9 |
| 3 | Christian Arnold v. Martin J. O'Malley | green | “the benefits are large in comparison to the amount of time counsel spent on the case.” | 7 |
| 4 | Christian Arnold v. Martin J. O'Malley | green | “the claimant's satisfaction with their attorney's representation, the attorney's expertise and efforts expended, whether the attorney engaged in any undue delay or overreaching, the uncertainty of recovery and risks of an adverse outcome, and how the effective hourly rate compar…” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.