Topic: a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in inform… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #972

9 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 251 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Smith v. Maryland.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Smith v. Maryland Anchor
scotus · 1979
red “a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties.” 53
2 Kyllo v. United States
scotus · 2001
green “a fourth amendment search occurs when the government violates a subjective expectation of privacy that society recognizes as reasonable.” 49
3 Smith v. Maryland
scotus · 1979
red “legitimate expectation of privacy” 46
4 United States v. Jones
scotus · 2012
green “the katz reasonable-expectation-of-privacy test has been added to, not substituted for, the common-law trespassory test.” 29
5 United States v. Miller
scotus · 1976
red “even if the information is revealed on the assumption that it will be used only for a limited purpose and the confidence placed in the third party will not be betrayed.” 18
6 United States v. Jones
scotus · 2012
green “gps monitoring generates a precise, comprehensive record of a person's public movements that reflects a wealth of detail about her familial, political, professional, religious, and sexual associations.” 17
7 Smith v. Maryland
scotus · 1979
red “this court consistently has held that a person has no legitimate expectation of privacy in information he voluntarily turns over to third parties.” 16
8 United States v. Miller
scotus · 1976
red “the fourth amendment does not prohibit the obtaining of information revealed to a third party and conveyed by him to government authorities, even if the information is revealed on the assumption that it will be used only for a limited purpose and the confidence placed in the thi…” 12
9 United States v. Miller
scotus · 1976
red “assert neither ownership nor possession” 11

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check