9 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Yasmine S. Hamad v. Sammy N. Hamad.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Yasmine S. Hamad v. Sammy N. Hamad Anchor | green | “necessarily implies that, for some decisions, conscientious jurists could reach different conclusions based on exactly the same facts-yet still remain entirely reasonable.” | 8 |
| 2 | Reston Hospital Center, LLC v. Karen Remley, M.D., M.B.A., F.A.A.P., etc. | green | “an abuse of discretion occurs only when reasonable jurists could not differ as to the proper decision.” | 7 |
| 3 | Rahnema v. Rahnema | green | “the impartial, consistent enforcement of scheduling orders provides systemic benefits to litigants and trial courts alike.” | 5 |
| 4 | Bennett v. Commonwealth | green | “no doubt continuances in the midst of trial should not be an everyday occurrence. nevertheless, such decisions are entrusted to the sound discretion of the trial court.” | 3 |
| 5 | Mikhaylov v. Sales | green | “failed to provide the information relating to the expert required by rule 4:1(b)(4)(a)(i), incorporated into the uniform pre trial scheduling order (ptso), until two months later, than the stated deadline.” | 3 |
| 6 | Mikhaylov v. Sales | green | “presumptive authority to prohibit a party in a material breach of an order regulating discovery from 'introducing designated matters in evidence.” | 3 |
| 7 | Mikhaylov v. Sales | green | “the ptso specifically warned that if a party failed to comply with the requirements of the ptso, the party would 'ordinarily not be permitted' to use the undisclosed expert opinion at trial.” | 3 |
| 8 | Judy Kay Reaves v. James Kelly Tucker | green | “a pretrial scheduling order has not otherwise been entered pursuant to the court's normal scheduling procedure, the court may, upon request of counsel of record for any party, or in its own discretion, enter the 7 the scheduling order contains many similar provisions, including …” | 3 |
| 9 | Judy Kay Reaves v. James Kelly Tucker | green | “in order for rule 1:18 scheduling orders to facilitate the orderly administration of cases . . . they must be enforced by the trial courts.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.