8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. Com.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fair Housing Coun., San Fernando v. Roommates. Com Anchor | green | “any activity that can be boiled down to deciding whether to exclude material that third parties seek to post online is perforce immune under section 230.” | 18 |
| 2 | Hill v. StubHub, Inc. | green | “declining to follow" nps as "inconsistent with the decisions concluding that knowledge of unlawful content does not strip a website of section 230 immunity” | 3 |
| 3 | First Global Communications, Inc. v. Bond | green | “knowledge about the illicit ads in its 'escorts' section shows that it is well aware that the services offered on its website are (1) illegal and (2) not the same as any of the lawful services regulated by state or municipal law.” | 3 |
| 4 | Anthony v. Yahoo! Inc. | green | “for the purpose of luring them into renewing their subscriptions.” | 3 |
| 5 | Milgram v. ORBITZ WORLDWIDE, INC. | green | “inconsistent with the decisions concluding that knowledge of unlawful content does not strip a website of section 230 immunity” | 3 |
| 6 | City of Chicago v. Stubhub!, Inc. | green | “does not depend on who 'publishes' any information or is a 'speaker” | 3 |
| 7 | Backpage.com, LLC v. McKenna | green | “unlikely that defendants would be able to prove that all online advertisements for escort services are ads for prostitution.” | 3 |
| 8 | State v. Fairfax | green | “beyond a reasonable doubt that no facts exist that would justify recovery” | 2 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.