7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Wynn v. Ibold, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Wynn v. Ibold, Inc. Anchor | green | “acts of the legislature carry a strong presumption of constitutionality.” | 7 |
| 2 | Bank Markazi v. Peterson | green | “the legislature 'may amend the law and make the change applicable to pending cases, even when the amendment is outcome determinative.” | 7 |
| 3 | Vision Mining, Inc. v. Gardner | green | “goal . . . is to 'keep governmental decision makers from treating differently persons who are in all relevant respects alike.” | 6 |
| 4 | Parker v. Webster County Coal, LLC | green | “the rational bases for treating younger and older workers differently are: (1) it prevents duplication of benefits; and (2) it results in savings for the workers' compensation system.” | 6 |
| 5 | Wynn v. Ibold, Inc. | green | “the principle of reducing workers' compensation benefits at an age when workers typically become eligible for alternative forms of income replacement is not new to kentucky.” | 5 |
| 6 | Vision Mining, Inc. v. Gardner | green | “keep governmental decision makers from treating differently persons who are in all relevant respects alike.” | 4 |
| 7 | Elk Horn Coal Corp. v. Cheyenne Resources, Inc. | green | “substantial and justifiable reason” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.