3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Lanzo Construction Co..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Lanzo Construction Co. Anchor | green | “the evidence is viewed in a light most favorable to the prosecution to determine whether the trial court could have found that the essential elements of the crime were proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 15 |
| 2 | People of Michigan v. David Joseph Miller | green | “minimal circumstantial evidence and reasonable inferences can sufficiently prove the defendant's state of mind, knowledge, or intent.” | 14 |
| 3 | People of Michigan v. David Joseph Miller | green | “this court reviews de novo a defendant's challenge to the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his or her conviction.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.