3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 29 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Gregory Heinen v. Northrop Grumman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gregory Heinen v. Northrop Grumman Anchor | green | “esidence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile-that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run.” | 20 |
| 2 | America's Best Inns, Inc., Cross-Appellee v. Best Inns of Abilene, L.P., Cross-Appellant | green | “in federal law citizenship means domicile, not residence.” | 6 |
| 3 | Gregory Heinen v. Northrop Grumman | green | “but residence may or may not demonstrate citizenship, which depends on domicile-that is to say, the state in which a person intends to live over the long run.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.