2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Chrysler Corp. v. Brown.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Chrysler Corp. v. Brown Anchor | green | “the remarks of a single legislator, even the sponsor, are not controlling in analyzing legislative history.” | 34 |
| 2 | Capital Network System, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission | green | “an agency's refusal to institute rulemaking proceedings has sufficient legal consequence to meet the second criterion of the finality doctrine.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.