3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp. Anchor | green | “the party seeking to uphold a restriction on commercial speech carries the burden of justifying it.” | 20 |
| 2 | In Re RMJ | green | “misleading advertising may be prohibited entirely.” | 11 |
| 3 | In Re RMJ | green | “truthful advertising related to lawful activities is entitled to the protections of the first amendment.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.