2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 37 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Bornette v. Barnhart.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Bornette v. Barnhart Anchor | green | “courts may not reverse and remand for failure to comply with a regulation without first considering whether the error was harmless.” | 19 |
| 2 | George W. FREY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis BOWEN, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “there are specific rules of law that must be followed in deciding whether evidence is substantial in these disability cases.” | 18 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.